Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit

Switching From Talc To Cornstarch May Not Be As Safe As Originally Thought

The potential for microbial contamination in cornstarch-containing products is one of the main causes of concern

Monday, March 11, 2024 - The move from talc to cornstarch comes in the wake of more than 53000 talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson's Baby Powder alleging the iconic baby care powder is tainted with asbestos or can cause cancer all by itself. Mostly used in cooking as a thickening agent, cornstarch has also been added to several consumer goods, such as baby powder. Since talc-based powders continue to raise safety issues, many producers have resorted to using cornstarch as a substitute. But the question still stands: Is cornstarch a truly safe replacement? Though it might seem like a less controversial choice than talc, some experts warn that there may still be health hazards associated with it.

The endosperm of corn kernels is used to make cornstarch, which is often considered safe for external usage. Because of its absorbent qualities, it is frequently used in cosmetics and personal care products. As such, it is a perfect element for powders meant to keep skin feeling comfortable and dry. In contrast to talc, which has been connected to respiratory problems and talcum powder cancer when inhaled, cornstarch is thought to be inert and unlikely to result in these health problems. Because of its bigger particle size, when given topically, it is less likely to be absorbed into the body, lowering the possibility of internal exposure. Though cornstarch is widely used and has a generally positive safety record, some experts advise being cautious when it comes to potential hazards. The potential for microbial contamination in cornstarch-containing products is one of the main causes of concern. In some circumstances, especially in warm and humid settings, cornstarch, like any organic material, can operate as a haven for bacteria and fungi. When contaminated powders are put on torn or irritated skin, there is a chance of infection, which can result in fungal infections or diaper rash. Manufacturers must follow strict quality control procedures and make sure cornstarch-based products are handled and stored properly to reduce this risk.

Inhalation is another risk cornstarch users must take into account. Prolonged exposure to airborne dust can irritate the respiratory tract and worsen pre-existing lung problems, even though cornstarch particles are larger and less likely to become airborne than talc particles. This is especially concerning in industries like food processing or manufacturing where employees may be exposed to high concentrations of cornstarch dust. The risk of respiratory irritation can be reduced and workers' health can be safeguarded with the use of personal protective equipment and adequate ventilation. Moreover, people who are allergic to corn should use items containing cornstarch with caution. True corn allergies are not common, but in those who are vulnerable, they can result in allergy reactions ranging from minor skin irritation to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Customers must carefully study product labels and speak with medical specialists if they have any questions regarding possible allergies. To verify compatibility and prevent negative reactions, people with sensitive skin or those who already have skin disorders should conduct patch tests before using products containing cornstarch.

Information provided by TalcumPowderCancerLawsuit.com, a website devoted to providing news about talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits, as well as medical research and findings.

More Recent Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit News:

View all Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit News

No-Cost, No-Obligation Baby Powder Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Developed Ovarian Cancer After a History of Perineal Baby Powder Use

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.

Privacy Notice: This site uses cookies for advertising, analytics and to improve our site services. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, see our cookie and privacy policy.