Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit

Retailers Face Legal Pressure to Pull All Talc Products from Store Shelves

People are suing big stores for still selling talc-based baby powder even when scientists warned them and the product was taken off the market

Sunday, July 13, 2025 - Retailers all around the US are now being sued for still selling talc-based baby powder, even though there is more and more scientific evidence against it and high-profile product recalls. Legal concerns say that big shop chains didn't do enough to protect consumers by keeping talcum powder products on shelves long after manufacturers stopped selling them. Plaintiffs argue that stores knew about the risks, including the possible relationship between talc and ovarian cancer, yet they still chose to put profits ahead of safety. In court, lawyers for people with talcum powder cancer are saying that these companies directly exposed customers to harmful products and should be held responsible along with the producers. The actions are part of a larger legal approach that holds not only producers but also the entire supply chain, including distributors and sellers, responsible. Lawyers believe that as more and more talcum powder cancer claims are filed, stores can no longer say they didn't know about health problems and product safety cautions that have been made public. Plaintiffs say that store brands and name-brand talc powders were being sold and marketed without the right warnings, even after international organizations said that talc with asbestos was likely to cause talcum powder cancer.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that between 2019 and 2023, a number of talc-based items were recalled after routine testing found amounts of asbestos, which is known to cause cancer. Even though these results were known, legal documents show that certain big stores kept selling the dangerous products for months, and in some cases years, after the first warnings. The FDA has said that it doesn't have the power to order cosmetics recalls right now, so it's mostly up to manufacturers and retailers to decide what to do. Consumer safety groups are now asking the federal government to do more to keep products that are known to be dangerous from being sold to the public. People in California, Illinois, and New Jersey have filed lawsuits saying that stores ignored these warning flags and kept selling products that should have been taken off the shelves or had health dangers on the labels. In response, some retailers have secretly stopped selling talc-based powders and switched to cornstarch-based ones instead. Critics, on the other hand, say that these moves were made too late and only after a lot of public and legal attention. Legal experts say that these lawsuits could result in big fines and set a precedent for making retailers responsible for selling harmful items to consumers.

As legal and public pressure grow, stores will probably have to deal with more questions about how they manage safety information for their products. It may soon be over for blaming only producers, especially when retailers had plenty of access to public health warnings but nevertheless sold the products anyhow. Talcum powder cancer lawyers expect more cases to emerge, especially as more people learn about the issue and more documents about internal business choices come to light.

Information provided by TalcumPowderCancerLawsuit.com, a website devoted to providing news about talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits, as well as medical research and findings.

More Recent Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit News:

View all Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit News

No-Cost, No-Obligation Baby Powder Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Developed Ovarian Cancer After a History of Perineal Baby Powder Use

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.


Privacy Notice: This site uses cookies for advertising, analytics and to improve our site services. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, see our cookie and privacy policy.