Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit

Johnson & Johnson Mislead Consumers About The Dangers of Talc

Johnson's Baby Powder has escaped the rigors of federal government regulation for more than a century

Friday, March 26, 2021 - Jurors have awarded plaintiffs hundreds of millions of dollars each, often the maximum a judge would allow, for the unnecessary pain and suffering they endured from decades of using Johnson's Baby Powder. Judges have told jurors that the company acted out of their profit-driven self-interest and exercised a willful disregard for public safety. It has now come to light that Johnson & Johnson may have failed to warn the public of what it had known for decades about the health dangers of using talcum powder. Talcum powder tests have revealed that the baby powder ingredient could contain trace amounts of asbestos, a well-documented cancer-causing mineral. In the 1970's, thousands of asbestos miners and many of the residents of the towns surrounding asbestos mines contracted and died from mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a type of lung cancer and the signature illness associated with inhaling asbestos. Inhaling asbestos may cause pleural disease, asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer. Internal company memos brought to light by a Reuters investigative report reveal the company grappled with deciding on what to do about their asbestos problem. According to the Reuters investigation, "(Court) documents, as well as deposition and trial testimony, shows that from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, the company's raw talc and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos, and that company executives, mine managers, scientists, doctors, and lawyers fretted over the problem and how to address it while failing to disclose it to regulators or the public." Even without incriminating communications, it would be implausible to think that Johnson & Johnson were unaware that a problem existed. Talc is found in adjacent and often overlapping mines around the world from the United States and China. Talc and asbestos mines use open-pit blasting operations that send enormous clouds of talc and asbestos intermingled together into the air.

The Reuters investigation also uncovered evidence that Johnson & Johnson exerted their influence on the federal government to keep their industry unregulated. "The documents also depict successful efforts to influence U.S. regulators' plans to limit asbestos in cosmetic talc products and scientific research on the health effects of talc." The FDA has set up a sub-committee to oversee, but not regulate or test cosmetics. Talcum powder lawsuits are handled by top national attorneys with a winning track record litigating against big corporations and pharmaceutical companies and offer a free consultation before filing a claim.

The public would be collectively aghast if they knew that the FDA does not regulate and has never regulated health care, beauty care, and baby care products that contain talc, and instead rely on the manufacturer's product safety representation. The FDA supervises but does not regulate or routinely test cosmetic products as might be assumed by the public. This fact was supported in court by a high-level Clubman Talcum Powder executive who told jurors that his company never thought to test their talc for asbestos and that the company's products safety representations are based on those made by talc mining companies or as is the case with Johnson & Johnson are the result of lax asbestos testing measures. Also, according to the FDA, "FDA's legal authority over cosmetics is different from our authority over other products we regulate, such as drugs, biologics, and medical devices. Under the law, cosmetic products and ingredients do not need FDA premarket approval, except for color additives."

More Recent Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit News:

View all Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit News

No-Cost, No-Obligation Baby Powder Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Developed Ovarian Cancer After a History of Perineal Baby Powder Use

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.

Privacy Notice: This site uses cookies for advertising, analytics and to improve our site services. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, see our cookie and privacy policy.