Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit

Johnson and Johnson Internal Research Unable to Rule Out Women's Cancer Risk

Internal corporate records show that assessments of product safety issues for talcum powder use did not allay worries about ovarian cancer from use

Wednesday, April 30, 2025 - An internal study done years ago by a big personal care company on talcum-based products is under increasing focus. According to recently examined records, internal safety studies did not exclude a potential cancer risk in women, especially those who used talc in the vaginal area. Although the firm insisted that its products were safe for decades, internal documents and confidential studies show that experts never come to a clear consensus on the relationship between talc and ovarian cancer. Now crucial to the arguments made by talcum powder cancer attorneys representing women in thousands of legal actions around the country is this unsolved ambiguity. Many of these women have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and participate in a talcum powder case aiming at reimbursement for pain and suffering, lost income, and medical expenses. The plaintiffs contend that the corporation should have been more open about the internal results, which seem to indicate residual questions regarding product safety. Rather, the talc products were sold as mild and safe for regular feminine hygiene, a message that detractors argue mislead women for decades.

The disclosures from internal research records are driving fresh discussions on manufacturers' obligations in notifying consumers about product hazards. Legal experts note that although failing to definitively show damage is not the same as establishing a product is safe, the marketing language employed over the years implied a degree of assurance not backed by internal science. In continuous litigation, where juries are expected to consider matters of corporate ethics and responsibility in addition to scientific evidence, this divergence is important. Calls from consumer safety advocates to tighten criteria on how health-related product claims are checked and approved have come from the failure to rule out cancer hazards. More women are also coming out to tell their tales; many of them learn only after diagnosis that there may have been known doubts about the safety of the talc they used for years. Public confidence in personal care products--and the businesses behind them--keeps eroding as the court cases go on. Industry watchers believe that the results of these internal research projects could cause long-lasting changes in corporate behavior and safety study disclosure going forward.

Internal study records from a big personal care company reveal that there was never any rule out regarding the possible link between talcum powder use and ovarian cancer. The company's own researchers were unable to completely rule out cancer hazards, despite continuous marketing campaigns stressing the safety of the product, which begs important issues currently crucial in talcum powder litigation. Talcum powder cancer lawyers contend that this non-disclosure of ambiguity misled customers and resulted in major health risks. The question of corporate responsibility, product labeling, and long-term consumer protection norms in the personal care sector is generating discussion as more cases wind up before the courts.

Information provided by TalcumPowderCancerLawsuit.com, a website devoted to providing news about talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits, as well as medical research and findings.

More Recent Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit News:

View all Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit News

No-Cost, No-Obligation Baby Powder Lawsuit Case Review for Persons or Families of Persons Who Developed Ovarian Cancer After a History of Perineal Baby Powder Use

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The firm has represented thousands of persons in these and other products liability litigation, including DePuy hip replacement systems, which settled for $2.5 billion and Pradaxa internal bleeding, which settled for $650 million. The Onder Law Firm won over $300 million in four talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis to date and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.


Privacy Notice: This site uses cookies for advertising, analytics and to improve our site services. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, see our cookie and privacy policy.